|
Researchers have confirmed suspicions that trail users such as
hikers and mountain bikers are helping to spread a disease that is
devastating Californian forests.
The researchers found the pathogen causing sudden oak death was
prevalent along trails through otherwise uninfected forests, but
almost absent in soil samples taken two metres away from the
trail.
They also found that the disease was more widespread in parks
heavily used for hiking, mountain biking and horse riding than in
less-visited areas. Previous work has shown that people can carry
the pathogen on their shoes, but this is the first study to provide
evidence of the consequences.
"Humans are moving the pathogen around, and the result seems to
be higher levels of the disease," says J Hall Cushman, a biologist
at Sonoma State University in California. He presented the data,
collected over the last two years, at the Ecological Society of
America conference in Portland, Oregon last week.
Difficult questions
Sudden oak death, caused by the fungus-like pathogen
Phytopthora ramorum, is sweeping through forests in coastal
California. It has also been detected in the UK and several other
European countries.
The pathogen kills some oak species, and causes a non-fatal leaf
disease in many other plants such as rhododendrons and California
bay. Researchers suspect the disease is also spread by water and by
other animals.
Cushman says the results pose difficult questions for land
managers in California, where outdoor recreation is hugely popular.
If managers do nothing, they may be criticised for not preventing
the spread the disease.
Restricting trail access during wet seasons, when the pathogen is
most active, would probably be most effective, but would also be
unpopular and hard to enforce.
Another possible control method is to ensure visitors clean their
shoes and bike tires before and after visits. The National Park
Service plans to test this method this winter.
Wild fires
The need for action was highlighted by another study presented at
the same conference. This predicted that in heavily infected areas
the disease will kill up to up to 69% of a dominant native tree
species, coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), within five
years.
| |
| |
Subscribe
to New Scientist for more news and features
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
For more related stories
search the print edition Archive
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
A dramatic protective measure against the disease was revealed in
a third study presented at the conference – wildfires. "We almost
never see infections in areas that burned" since 1950, says Max
Moritz of the University of California, Berkeley.
Periodic wildfires are natural occurrences, but managers have
historically suppressed them. Researchers are now working to
discover why fires should have such a long-lasting effect.
The news that people and fire affect the spread of sudden oak
death matches the experience of Patrick Robards, a ranger at China
Camp State Park. The park is a notorious hotspot for sudden oak
death that gets 300,000 visitors a year.
Robards conducted controlled burns as part of the park management
regime, but stopped in 1999 due to lack of funds. He estimates that
in burned areas fewer than 5% of oaks show signs of the disease - in
areas that did not burn, up to 90% of oaks are dying or already
dead. |